Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Bemidji High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.080 | 0.0128 | 0.0128 |
| 2012-13 | Bemidji High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.208 | 0.0335 | 0.0335 |
| 2013-14 | Bemidji High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 22 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.273 | 0.0438 | 0.0438 |
| 2014-15 | Bemidji High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 0.542 | 0.0870 | 0.0870 |
| 2015-16 | Bemidji High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.360 | 0.0578 | 0.0578 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Bemidji State | CHA-W | SR | 36 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.250 |
| 2018-19 | Bemidji State | CHA-W | JR | 36 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.083 |
| 2017-18 | Bemidji State | CHA-W | SO | 36 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.083 |
| 2016-17 | Bemidji State | CHA-W | FR | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2015-16 | Bemidji State | CHA-W | — | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.143 |
| 2004-05 | Hamline | MIAC | JR | 23 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.043 |
| 2003-04 | Hamline | MIAC | SO | 23 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.043 |
| 2002-03 | Hamline | MIAC | FR | 25 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.120 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lauren Niska | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Kate Glover | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG | 0.167 | Harvard |
| Paige Michel | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG | 0.348 | UConn |
| Abby Ecker | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG | 0.000 | Bemidji State |
| Ellie Larson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG | 0.143 | RIT |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.