← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Kate Glover Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-07-17 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.15
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1535
Conf. Strength0.994
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W / D2W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.38
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.4042
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2012-13 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 1 7 8 0.348 0.0559 0.0559
2013-14 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 1 5 6 0.273 0.0438 0.0438
2014-15 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 2 9 11 0.500 0.0803 0.0803
2015-16 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 9 15 24 0.960 0.1542 0.1542
2016-17 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 6 23 29 1.160 0.1863 0.1863
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2021-22 Harvard ECAC-W SR 31 2 3 5 0.161
2020-21 Harvard ECAC-W JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Harvard ECAC-W SO 33 1 4 5 0.151
2018-19 Harvard ECAC-W FR 32 0 5 5 0.156
2017-18 Harvard ECAC-W FR 30 0 5 5 0.167

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Grace Bizal USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG 0.268 Boston College
Kate Hallett USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.100 Harvard
Katie Robinson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.129 Minnesota
Mekenzie Steffen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG 0.350 Wisconsin
Dani Sadek USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG 0.611 Ohio State

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.