← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Ellie Larson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-04-23 Country: USA

NCAA-W Projection

Projecting as:

Target Conference:

Show:

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W

0.20

Developing (<0.25)

Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2138

Conf. Strength0.994

Year Adj (FR)×0.80

Confidencehigh

Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W / D2W

Projected PPG — Division Avg

0.46

Average (0.35–0.65)

Base D3e-W PPG0.4851

Conf. Strength1.000

Year Adj (FR)×0.80

Confidencehigh

Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-W PPG	Age-Adjusted
2012-13	Hutchinson High	USHS-MN-W	20	2	4	6	0.300	0.0482	0.0482
2013-14	Hutchinson High	USHS-MN-W	24	11	7	18	0.750	0.1205	0.1205
2014-15	Hutchinson High	USHS-MN-W	25	13	12	25	1.000	0.1606	0.1606
2015-16	Hutchinson High	USHS-MN-W	25	19	12	31	1.240	0.1991	0.1991
2016-17	Hutchinson High	USHS-MN-W	24	14	18	32	1.333	0.2141	0.2141

NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent · COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

Season	School	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2020-21	RIT	CHA-W	—	16	0	2	2	0.125
2019-20	RIT	CHA-W	—	31	4	7	11	0.355
2018-19	RIT	CHA-W	—	35	6	10	16	0.457
2017-18	RIT	CHA-W	FR	35	0	5	5	0.143

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

Player	League · Season · PPG	FR College PPG	School
Dani Sadek	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG	0.611	Ohio State
Grace Bizal	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG	0.268	Boston College
Kate Hallett	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG	0.100	Harvard
Katie Robinson	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG	0.129	Minnesota
Mekenzie Steffen	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG	0.350	Wisconsin

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.