← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Marin Healey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.02
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0261
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.06
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.0633
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

2%
NCAA D1W
5%
NCAA D3W
92%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 Lovell Academy 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 61 1 4 5 0.082 0.0261 0.0261
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Suffolk CNE FR 21 0 0 0 0.000

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Serena Sommerfield NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG 0.000 Boston College
McKenzie Sederberg USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG 0.125 Minnesota State
Katie Carlson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG 0.000 RIT
Katarina Seper USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG 0.050 RPI
Xylia Lang USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG 0.091 Lindenwood

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Alexis Larsen 2024-25 · 0.83 PPG 0.083 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Astrid Wilbur 2023-24 · 0.23 PPG 0.292 Hood College UCHC
Mackenzie Igel-Harris 2022-23 · 0.14 PPG Lawrence NCHA
Lexie Weiss 2013-14 · 1.57 PPG 0.037 Wisconsin-Superior WIAC
Kristi Peters 2013-14 · 0.42 PPG 0.125 Manhattanville UCHC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.