IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Courtney Leising Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Maple Grove High (W) USHS-MN-W 21 1 0 1 0.048 0.0072 0.0072 — —
2019-20 Maple Grove High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 3 5 8 0.348 0.0525 0.0525 — —
2020-21 Maple Grove High (W) USHS-MN-W 18 4 6 10 0.556 0.0839 0.0839 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — — 27 14 17 31 1.148
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — JR 28 13 7 20 0.714
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — SO 27 10 5 15 0.556
2021-22 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — FR 27 14 6 20 0.741
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.01
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.74
2021-22 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+11851.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11090
Forward overall
#3903
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Annelise Rice
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.01 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Amber Moore
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.05 PPG
→ Cornell (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.01 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Anna Johnson
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stella Haberman
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ RIT (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Olivia Arkell
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.02 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Annelise Rice
North Dakota ·
0.080 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Amber Moore
Cornell ·
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Johnson
Mercyhurst ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.