← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Marta Mazzocchi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-23 Country: Italy
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.25
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2944
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.58
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.6780
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

22%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
78%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2022-23 Newark Ironbound 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 73 34 32 66 0.904 0.2878 0.2756
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2024-25 Trinity NESCAC SO 22 6 8 14 0.636
2023-24 Trinity NESCAC FR 22 8 8 16 0.727

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Liz Schepers USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG 0.410 Ohio State
Paige Voight USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG 0.559 Merrimack
Mariah Gardner USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG 0.071 Minnesota State
Emily Gunderson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG 0.171 Lindenwood
Lindsay Roethke USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG 0.027 UConn

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Delaney Carle 2014-15 · 1.93 PPG 0.346 Nazareth UCHC
Jillian Bilsborough 2022-23 · 1.39 PPG 0.481 Aurora NCHA
Emily Ach 2015-16 · 1.64 PPG 0.407 Augsburg MIAC
Jessica VonRuden 2014-15 · 1.00 PPG 0.667 Adrian NCHA
Laura Denchfield 2016-17 · 1.00 PPG 0.667 St. Catherine MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.