IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grace Lankas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Apple Valley High (women) USHS-MN-W 14 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Apple Valley High (women) USHS-MN-W 19 0 1 1 0.053 0.0079 0.0079 — —
2018-19 Apple Valley High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 6 8 14 0.583 0.0881 0.0881 — —
2019-20 Apple Valley High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 6 17 23 0.920 0.1389 0.1389 — —
2020-21 Apple Valley High (women) USHS-MN-W 21 3 9 12 0.571 0.0863 0.0863 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 St. Olaf D3 — SR 25 3 8 11 0.440
2023-24 St. Olaf D3 — JR 25 1 8 9 0.360
2022-23 St. Olaf D3 — SO 26 4 17 21 0.808
2021-22 St. Olaf D3 — FR 23 1 2 3 0.130
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2021-22 · St. Olaf
+146.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2519
Defenseman overall
#1962
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Andrea Olson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.58 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Amanda Kimmerle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ RPI (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Megan Hinze
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mckenzie Revering
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
McKenna Wesloh
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrea Olson
Merrimack ·
0.056 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Amanda Kimmerle
RPI ·
0.059 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Megan Hinze
Minnesota State ·
0.182 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.