IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Megan Hinze Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 25 4 8 12 0.480 0.0771 0.0771 — —
2012-13 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 25 4 11 15 0.600 0.0964 0.0964 — —
2013-14 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 25 7 11 18 0.720 0.1156 0.1156 — —
2014-15 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 23 7 14 21 0.913 0.1466 0.1466 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 35 1 9 10 0.286
2017-18 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 34 2 7 9 0.265
2017-18 Minnesota State D1 WCHA-W JR 34 2 7 9 0.265
2016-17 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 33 5 2 7 0.212
2016-17 Minnesota State D1 WCHA-W SO 33 5 2 7 0.212
2015-16 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 22 1 3 4 0.182
2015-16 Minnesota State D1 WCHA-W FR 22 1 3 4 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2015-16 · Minnesota
+43.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2093
Defenseman overall
#1589
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Kenzie Prater
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Allison Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ebba Strandberg
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Maine (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Mekenzie Steffen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Arianna Kosakowski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kenzie Prater
Quinnipiac ·
0.432 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Allison Roethke
Quinnipiac ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ebba Strandberg
Maine ·
0.333 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.