icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Amherst/Sweet Home/Clarence | USHS-W | 21 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 0.476 | 0.1432 | 0.1432 | — | — |
| 2017-18 | Amherst/Sweet Home/Clarence | USHS-W | 20 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.200 | 0.0601 | 0.0601 | — | — |
| 2019-20 | Amherst/Sweet Home/Clarence | USHS-W | 16 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 0.562 | 0.1691 | 0.1691 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Buffalo State | D3 | — | — | 25 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.240 |
| 2023-24 | Buffalo State | D3 | — | — | 24 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.250 |
| 2022-23 | Buffalo State | D3 | — | — | 25 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.320 |
| 2021-22 | Buffalo State | D3 | — | — | 20 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.200 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.