Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Armstrong/Cooper High | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.042 | 0.0063 | 0.0063 |
| 2019-20 | Armstrong/Cooper High | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 0.542 | 0.0818 | 0.0818 |
| 2020-21 | Armstrong/Cooper High | USHS-MN-W | 18 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.278 | 0.0419 | 0.0419 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Dubuque | NCHA | SO | 22 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0.182 |
| 2023-24 | Dubuque | NCHA | FR | 25 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0.200 |
| 2022-23 | Finlandia | NCHA | SO | 25 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.080 |
| 2021-22 | Finlandia | NCHA | FR | 25 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.040 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annelise Rice | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG | 0.080 | North Dakota |
| Anna Johnson | USHS-W · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG | 0.027 | Mercyhurst |
| Amber Moore | USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.05 PPG | 0.133 | Cornell |
| Becca Gilmore | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG | 1.167 | Harvard |
| Madison Nichols | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG | 0.360 | St. Michael's College |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexa March | 2023-24 · 0.21 PPG | 0.095 | Saint Mary's | MIAC |
| Bailey Coole | 2022-23 · 0.52 PPG | 0.042 | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
| Maria Hatzidakis | 2022-23 · 0.10 PPG | 0.091 | Johnson & Wales | NEHC |
| Kaiya Johnson | 2024-25 · 0.38 PPG | 0.074 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | WIAC |
| Michaella Gonzalez | 2024-25 · 0.15 PPG | 0.077 | MCLA | MASCAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.