IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Julia Mings Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Amherst/Sweet Home/Clarence USHS-W 22 33 23 56 2.546 0.7654 0.7654 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 William Smith D3 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 William Smith D3 — — 25 10 16 26 1.040
2018-19 William Smith D3 — — 28 16 11 27 0.964
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.76
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2018-19 · William Smith
+26.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#186
Forward overall
#42
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Nicole Guagliardo
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.54 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.50 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.75 No data
NCAAe PPG
Aly Tremblay
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG
→ RPI (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.78 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Abbenante
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Phoebe Staenz
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Yale (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.86 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicole Guagliardo
Mercyhurst ·
0.156 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Detert
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Aly Tremblay
RPI ·
0.030 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.