IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Abigail Stow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Eau Claire Area Stars USHS-W 24 39 21 60 2.500 0.7518 0.7518 — —
2015-16 Eau Claire Area Stars USHS-W 23 55 24 79 3.435 1.0328 1.0328 — —
2016-17 — USHS-W 24 42 39 81 3.375 1.0149 1.0149 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — — 29 15 26 41 1.414
2021-22 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — — 27 12 37 49 1.815
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — — 12 11 7 18 1.500
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — — 27 24 17 41 1.518
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — — 27 12 14 26 0.963
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
1.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2018-19 · Wisconsin-River Falls
-11.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#85
Forward overall
#8
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Erin Conway
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.48 PPG
→ Brown (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.92 Average
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.88 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Theresa Knutson
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 3.95 PPG
→ UConn (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
1.09 Average
NCAAe PPG
Maria Lindh
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.90 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Erin Conway
Brown ·
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrea Renner
Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Theresa Knutson
UConn ·
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.