IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Madi Nolan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Forest Lake High (MN women) USHS-MN-W 25 9 9 18 0.720 0.1087 0.1087 — —
2013-14 Forest Lake High (MN women) USHS-MN-W 23 11 10 21 0.913 0.1379 0.1379 — —
2014-15 Forest Lake High (MN women) USHS-MN-W 25 12 13 25 1.000 0.1510 0.1510 — —
2015-16 Forest Lake High (MN women) USHS-MN-W 25 12 26 38 1.520 0.2295 0.2295 — —
2016-17 Forest Lake High (MN women) USHS-MN-W 24 13 29 42 1.750 0.2642 0.2642 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC JR 28 4 20 24 0.857
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC SO 27 12 14 26 0.963
2017-18 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC FR 23 9 10 19 0.826
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.83
2017-18 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+285.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3008
Forward overall
#361
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Amy Petersen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ Penn State (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Paige Voight
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Casey Leveillee
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emily Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hattie Verstegen
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Morgan Mordini
Elmira · 2017-18
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brooke Remington
Franklin Pierce · 2016-17
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.