IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Abby Brustad Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Westonka/SW Christian High USHS-MN-W 25 10 10 20 0.800 0.1208 0.1208 — —
2012-13 Westonka/SW Christian High USHS-MN-W 25 11 11 22 0.880 0.1329 0.1329 — —
2013-14 Westonka/SW Christian High USHS-MN-W 25 16 15 31 1.240 0.1872 0.1872 — —
2014-15 Westonka/SW Christian High USHS-MN-W 25 6 15 21 0.840 0.1268 0.1268 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Williams D3 — — 29 11 15 26 0.897
2017-18 Williams D3 — JR 25 11 13 24 0.960
2016-17 Williams D3 — SO 19 3 8 11 0.579
2015-16 Williams D3 — FR 16 3 1 4 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2015-16 · Williams
+93.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5337
Forward overall
#1078
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Holly Dietzler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jessica Bonfe
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kylie Hanley
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Suvi Ollikainen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rose Rather
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.82 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Holly Dietzler
Lindenwood ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jessica Bonfe
Merrimack ·
0.206 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kylie Hanley
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.