IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alyssa Hulst Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-09-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Berwick NE-Prep-Girls 29 12 14 26 0.900 0.5585 0.5585 — —
2015-16 Berwick NE-Prep-Girls 25 25 27 52 2.080 1.2906 1.2906 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Norwich D3 NEHC SR 24 5 5 10 0.417
2018-19 Norwich D3 NEHC JR 29 8 14 22 0.759
2017-18 Norwich D3 NEHC SO 30 16 14 30 1.000
2016-17 Norwich D3 NEHC FR 10 2 5 7 0.700
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.99
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2016-17 · Norwich
-29.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#206
Forward overall
#12
Forward born in 1997
#18
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Shayna Tomlinson
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Rensselaer (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.94 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brooke Avery
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.90 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.85 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Theresa Knutson
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 3.95 PPG
→ UConn (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
1.06 Average
NCAAe PPG
Maria Lindh
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.88 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Celia Midtbo
Saint Mary's · 2022-23
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hailey Herdine
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
1.185 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jessica Bird
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.