IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hannah Zavoral Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 St. Paul Blades (women) USHS-MN-W 23 5 9 14 0.609 0.0919 0.0919 — —
2014-15 St. Paul Blades (women) USHS-MN-W 24 8 3 11 0.458 0.0692 0.0692 — —
2015-16 St. Paul Blades (women) USHS-MN-W 25 24 15 39 1.560 0.2356 0.2356 — —
2016-17 St. Paul Blades (women) USHS-MN-W 25 49 14 63 2.520 0.3805 0.3805 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC — 22 12 3 15 0.682
2020-21 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC JR 4 3 1 4 1.000
2018-19 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SO 3 0 1 1 0.333
2017-18 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#2343
Forward overall
#227
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Katie Rooney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Darby Dodds
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.52 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Corbin Boyd
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Emily Martino
William Smith · 2014-15
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Annika Horman
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2018-19
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Courtney Moriarty
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.