← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Julia Barrett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-10-14 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.14
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1436
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.32
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.3344
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2014-15 Walled Lake Wild USHS-W 17 20 9 29 1.706 0.1448 0.1448
2015-16 Walled Lake Wild USHS-W 14 1 2 3 0.214 0.0182 0.0182
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2021-22 Adrian NCHA SR 24 0 9 9 0.375
2020-21 Adrian NCHA JR 16 2 6 8 0.500
2019-20 Adrian NCHA SO 24 2 7 9 0.375
2018-19 Adrian NCHA FR 28 4 11 15 0.536

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Hannah Schultz USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG 0.267 Union
Anna Erickson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG 0.030 Vermont
Paige Sorensen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.09 PPG 0.529 Merrimack
Katarina Seper USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG 0.050 RPI
McKenzie Sederberg USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG 0.125 Minnesota State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Leah Elledge 2012-13 · 1.44 PPG 0.032 Lindenwood CHA-W
Talia Stein Trujillo 2024-25 · 0.29 PPG 0.167 Suffolk CNE
Kristi Peters 2013-14 · 0.42 PPG 0.125 Manhattanville UCHC
Hannah Graunke 2022-23 · 0.23 PPG 0.179 St. Norbert NCHA
Mackenzie Igel-Harris 2022-23 · 0.14 PPG — Lawrence NCHA

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.