icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Dodge County High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.083 | 0.0126 | 0.0126 | — | — |
| 2011-12 | Dodge County High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0.200 | 0.0302 | 0.0302 | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Dodge County High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 0.417 | 0.0629 | 0.0629 | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Dodge County High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 0.800 | 0.1208 | 0.1208 | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Dodge County High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 0.640 | 0.0966 | 0.0966 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | St. Catherine | D3 | — | — | 25 | 11 | 7 | 18 | 0.720 |
| 2017-18 | St. Catherine | D3 | — | — | 25 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.400 |
| 2016-17 | Hamline | D3 | MIAC | SO | 26 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0.423 |
| 2015-16 | Hamline | D3 | MIAC | FR | 25 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.520 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.