← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bella Wagner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 4 9 13 0.520 0.0785 0.0785
2012-13 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 6 3 9 0.391 0.0591 0.0591
2013-14 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 10 22 32 1.280 0.1933 0.1933
2014-15 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 18 38 56 2.240 0.3382 0.3382
2015-16 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 24 21 45 1.800 0.2718 0.2718
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC SR 29 15 9 24 0.828
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC JR 21 7 11 18 0.857
2017-18 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC SO 4 1 2 3 0.750
2016-17 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC FR 19 7 4 11 0.579
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2016-17 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+126.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2162
Forward overall
#190
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ Penn State (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Plattsburgh · 2021-22
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2010-11
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2014-15
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.