IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lexie Martinez Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Team Colorado 19U AAA JWHL-U19 17 1 2 3 0.176 0.0663 0.0663 — —
2015-16 Team Colorado 19U AAA JWHL-U19 26 4 5 9 0.346 0.1300 0.1300 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Aurora D3 NCHA — 23 3 9 12 0.522
2020-21 Aurora D3 NCHA — 14 2 7 9 0.643
2019-20 Aurora D3 NCHA — 27 7 8 15 0.556
2018-19 Aurora D3 NCHA — 25 8 6 14 0.560
2017-18 Aurora D3 NCHA — 25 1 6 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2017-18 · Aurora
+212.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8581
Forward overall
#295
in JWHL-U19

D1 Comparables

Amanda Bäckebo
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Syracuse (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Holly Dietzler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jessica Bonfe
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kylie Hanley
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Suvi Ollikainen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amanda Bäckebo
Syracuse ·
0.056 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Holly Dietzler
Lindenwood ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jessica Bonfe
Merrimack ·
0.206 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.