IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jessica Bonfe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Woodbury High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 6 5 11 0.440 0.0707 0.0707 — —
2011-12 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 25 8 13 21 0.840 0.1349 0.1349 — —
2012-13 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 25 8 13 21 0.840 0.1349 0.1349 — —
2013-14 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 25 18 9 27 1.080 0.1734 0.1734 — —
2014-15 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 24 24 19 43 1.792 0.2877 0.2877 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Merrimack D1 — — 36 8 2 10 0.278
2017-18 Merrimack D1 — — 29 6 3 9 0.310
2016-17 Merrimack D1 — — 36 10 7 17 0.472
2015-16 Merrimack D1 — — 34 3 4 7 0.206
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2015-16 · Merrimack
-0.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3523
Forward overall
#139
Forward born in 1997
#498
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Casey Leveillee
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Paige Voight
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Amy Petersen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ Penn State (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Casey Leveillee
Vermont ·
0.265 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Paige Voight
Merrimack ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amy Petersen
Penn State ·
0.784 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.