IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gina Mangiafridda Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep-Girls 23 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep-Girls 22 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep-Girls 23 0 1 1 0.040 0.0248 0.0248 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SR 21 4 9 13 0.619
2017-18 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 23 6 6 12 0.522
2016-17 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 14 3 3 6 0.429
2015-16 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#17185
Forward overall
#1695
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Haley Mullins
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Becca Gilmore
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Harvard (1.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Olivia Arkell
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.02 No data
NCAAe PPG
Megan Berg
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
Morgan McKim
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.10 PPG
→ Cornell (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Haley Mullins
Harvard ·
0.306 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Becca Gilmore
Harvard ·
1.167 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Olivia Arkell
Minnesota ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.