IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Amber Heidenreich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Hayward High USHS-W 23 16 17 33 1.435 0.4314 0.4314 — —
2014-15 Hayward High USHS-W 24 21 15 36 1.500 0.4511 0.4511 — —
2015-16 Hayward High USHS-W 24 25 16 41 1.708 0.5137 0.5137 — —
2016-17 Hayward High USHS-W 23 23 14 37 1.609 0.4837 0.4837 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC — 10 3 7 10 1.000
2019-20 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 27 5 8 13 0.481
2018-19 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 27 5 8 13 0.481
2017-18 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 26 6 7 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2017-18 · Wisconsin-Superior
+17.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#775
Forward overall
#259
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.92 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emma Nuutinen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Abbenante
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hayley Walsh
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.194 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michaela O'Connor
Williams · 2015-16
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jessica Bird
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.