IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jenna Curtis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 WSFLG Blizzard USHS-W 22 30 29 59 2.682 0.8064 0.8064 — —
2014-15 Hayward High USHS-W 24 21 19 40 1.667 0.5012 0.5012 — —
2015-16 Hayward High USHS-W 24 16 26 42 1.750 0.5262 0.5262 — —
2016-17 Hayward High USHS-W 23 22 12 34 1.478 0.4445 0.4445 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC — 25 4 11 15 0.600
2020-21 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC — 10 4 3 7 0.700
2019-20 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 27 8 4 12 0.444
2018-19 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 27 7 4 11 0.407
2017-18 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 27 3 3 6 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.41
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2017-18 · Wisconsin-Superior
-45.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#790
Forward overall
#261
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Abbenante
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Rooney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Morganne Dee
Arcadia · 2017-18
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aubrey Nelvin
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ellie Woodman
Concordia (WI) · 2013-14
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.