IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Olyvia Opsahl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Duluth High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 1 4 5 0.200 0.0302 0.0302 — —
2014-15 Duluth High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 6 4 10 0.417 0.0629 0.0629 — —
2015-16 Proctor/Hermantown High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 4 7 11 0.440 0.0664 0.0664 — —
2016-17 Proctor/Hermantown High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 9 10 19 0.760 0.1148 0.1148 — —
2017-18 Proctor/Hermantown High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 4 9 13 0.542 0.0818 0.0818 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Lake Forest D3 — — 25 9 9 18 0.720
2020-21 Lake Forest D3 — — 6 1 0 1 0.167
2019-20 Lake Forest D3 — — 28 4 7 11 0.393
2018-19 Lake Forest D3 NCHA — 27 0 10 10 0.370
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2018-19 · Lake Forest
+312.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3042
Defenseman overall
#2395
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Kate Rydland
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG
→ Penn State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Emma Turbyville
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mckenzie Revering
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
McKenna Wesloh
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Boyle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kate Rydland
Penn State ·
0.161 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Emma Turbyville
St. Cloud State ·
0.040 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Mckenzie Revering
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.059 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.