IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackie Kilar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Boston Shamrocks JWHL-U19 26 0 2 2 0.077 0.0289 0.0289 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SR 15 2 6 8 0.533
2017-18 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 24 2 7 9 0.375
2016-17 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 16 1 3 4 0.250
2015-16 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 1 1 1 2 2.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
2.00
2015-16 · Wesleyan
+7226.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7087
Defenseman overall
#530
in JWHL-U19

D1 Comparables

Xylia Lang
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Rachel Herzog
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Carlson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
Heather Olson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
McKenzie Sederberg
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Xylia Lang
Lindenwood ·
0.091 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Rachel Herzog
St. Cloud State ·
0.056 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Carlson
RIT ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.