IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aimely Michaud-Nolan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-09-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 NAHA Red 16U 16U-AAA-W 64 1 24 25 0.391 0.1751 0.1751 — —
2015-16 NAHA White 19U AAA JWHL-U19 26 3 5 8 0.308 0.1155 0.1155 — —
2016-17 NAHA White 19U AAA JWHL-U19 19 0 4 4 0.210 0.0790 0.0790 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colby D3 NESCAC — 23 1 5 6 0.261
2022-23 Colby D3 NESCAC — 26 4 12 16 0.615
2021-22 Colby D3 NESCAC — 16 3 10 13 0.812
2020-21 Colby D3 NESCAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Colby D3 NESCAC — 18 0 7 7 0.389
2018-19 Colby D3 NESCAC — 18 1 5 6 0.333
2017-18 Union D1 ECAC-W — 6 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#2830
Defenseman overall
#292
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Lauren Boyle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Brittney Anderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Rydland
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG
→ Penn State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Emma Turbyville
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mckenzie Revering
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lauren Boyle
Ohio State ·
0.486 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Brittney Anderson
St. Cloud State ·
0.571 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Kate Rydland
Penn State ·
0.161 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.