IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Natasha Steinle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 CIHA U19 JWHL-U19 21 7 7 14 0.667 0.2503 0.2503 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC — 25 9 5 14 0.560
2018-19 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC — 14 4 3 7 0.500
2017-18 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC — 26 5 8 13 0.500
2016-17 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC — 26 14 5 19 0.731
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2016-17 · Buffalo State
+241.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3393
Forward overall
#89
in JWHL-U19

D1 Comparables

Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Abby Halluska
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gabby Billing
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Charly Dalhquist
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sena Hanson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hattie Verstegen
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Morgan Mordini
Elmira · 2017-18
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brooke Remington
Franklin Pierce · 2016-17
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.