← New Search ↗ Social Card

Danielle Bos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Monsignor Martin USHS-W 20 1 3 4 0.200 0.0601 0.0601
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Chatham D3 UCHC 25 2 8 10 0.400
2018-19 Chatham D3 UCHC 25 3 2 5 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2018-19 · Chatham
+252.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4694
Defenseman overall
#3713
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Harvard (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ UConn (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bemidji State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota State ·
0.130 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.