← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Danielle Bos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.09
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0977
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.21
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2231
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2016-17 Monsignor Martin USHS-W 20 1 3 4 0.200 0.0165 0.0165
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2019-20 Chatham UCHC SO 25 2 8 10 0.400
2018-19 Chatham UCHC FR 25 3 2 5 0.200

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Hannah Schultz USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG 0.267 Union
Anna Erickson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG 0.030 Vermont
Paige Sorensen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.09 PPG 0.529 Merrimack
Katarina Seper USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG 0.050 RPI
McKenzie Sederberg USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG 0.125 Minnesota State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Talia Stein Trujillo 2024-25 · 0.29 PPG 0.167 Suffolk CNE
Hannah Graunke 2022-23 · 0.23 PPG 0.179 St. Norbert NCHA
Kristi Peters 2013-14 · 0.42 PPG 0.125 Manhattanville UCHC
Anna Elizarkov 2024-25 · 0.30 PPG 0.148 Southern Maine LittleEast
Jenna Britz 2024-25 · 0.20 PPG 0.240 Wisconsin-Stevens Point WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.