IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mikah Baptiste Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Kimball Union NE-Prep-Girls 6 6 5 11 1.830 1.1355 1.1355 — —
2016-17 Kimball Union NE-Prep-Girls 23 6 2 8 0.350 0.2172 0.2172 — —
2017-18 Kimball Union NE-Prep-Girls 27 11 11 22 0.810 0.5026 0.5026 — —
2018-19 Kimball Union NE-Prep-Girls 24 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 New Hampshire D1 HEA-W GR 35 0 2 2 0.057
2022-23 Norwich D3 — — 29 22 10 32 1.103
2021-22 Norwich D3 — — 27 18 18 36 1.333
2020-21 Norwich D3 — — 5 2 4 6 1.200
2019-20 Norwich D3 — — 27 8 10 18 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2019-20 · Norwich
+100.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 33 comparables)

27%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
73%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5509
Forward overall
#224
Forward born in 2000
#355
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Natasia Burzynski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Providence (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emma Nuutinen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Schammel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.45 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Caroline Murphy
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Yale (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Natasia Burzynski
Providence ·
0.030 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Emma Nuutinen
North Dakota ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicole Schammel
Minnesota State ·
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.