IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kaylee Liberty Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Chicago Young Americans 19U JWHL-U19 27 5 4 9 0.333 0.1251 0.1251 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Endicott D3 NEHC — 23 7 7 14 0.609
2021-22 Endicott D3 NEHC — 24 8 9 17 0.708
2020-21 Endicott D3 NEHC — 6 5 3 8 1.333
2019-20 Endicott D3 NEHC — 25 6 7 13 0.520
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2019-20 · Endicott
+385.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7445
Forward overall
#302
Forward born in 2001
#242
in JWHL-U19

D1 Comparables

Kippin Keller
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sierra Semmel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Maine
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mac Johnson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Abby Halluska
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Freiburger
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jenna Curtis
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ellie Woodman
Concordia (WI) · 2011-12
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Abbey Hardwick
Concordia · 2018-19
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.