← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marissa Gebauer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Anaheim Lady Ducks 16U AAA 16U-AAA-W 57 23 21 44 0.772 0.3461 0.3461
2017-18 Anaheim Lady Ducks 16U AAA 16U-AAA-W 45 15 20 35 0.778 0.3488 0.3488
2018-19 Anaheim Lady Ducks 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 47 22 26 48 1.021 0.3478 0.3478
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Lake Forest D3 28 10 13 23 0.821
2021-22 Lake Forest D3 24 14 9 23 0.958
2020-21 Lake Forest D3 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Lake Forest D3 26 8 1 9 0.346
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2019-20 · Lake Forest
+16.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1701
Forward overall

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.32 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.32 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.26 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Yale ·
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
North Dakota ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Northeastern ·
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.