IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alyssa Heim Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Beaver Dam/Randolph High USHS-W 21 34 10 44 2.095 0.6300 0.6300 — —
2016-17 — USHS-W 24 55 8 63 2.625 0.7893 0.7893 — —
2018-19 Beaver Dam/Randolph High USHS-W 23 26 17 43 1.870 0.5622 0.5622 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Marian D3 NCHA — 26 6 9 15 0.577
2022-23 Marian D3 NCHA — 27 4 10 14 0.518
2020-21 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — — 6 1 0 1 0.167
2019-20 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — — 12 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#313
Forward overall
#83
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Annie Roche
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG
→ Colgate
0.56 No data
NCAAe PPG
Saana Valkama
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.58 No data
NCAAe PPG
Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.54 No data
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.60 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Annie Roche
Colgate ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Saana Valkama
Vermont ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ivy Dynek
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.