IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Annika Horman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Fox Cities Stars USHS-W 22 28 24 52 2.364 0.7107 0.7107 — —
2019-20 — USHS-W 19 14 12 26 1.368 0.4115 0.4115 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SR 27 4 5 9 0.333
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 17 8 0 8 0.471
2021-22 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 24 5 1 6 0.250
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 10 3 1 4 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.66
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2020-21 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
-39.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 33 comparables)

24%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
76%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#584
Forward overall
#188
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Jessie Aney
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 4.36 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Erin Conway
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.48 PPG
→ Brown (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Schammel
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 4.16 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.27 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.50 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.73 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Emily Bauer
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kora Torkelson
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Allie Bussey
St. Scholastica · 2016-17
1.062 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.