IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Julia McAlpin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-03-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 25 0 2 2 0.080 0.0121 0.0121 — —
2017-18 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 25 1 8 9 0.360 0.0544 0.0544 — —
2018-19 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 25 5 11 16 0.640 0.0966 0.0966 — —
2019-20 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 25 1 8 9 0.360 0.0544 0.0544 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Bethel D3 MIAC — 21 1 9 10 0.476
2021-22 Bethel D3 MIAC — 20 3 2 5 0.250
2020-21 Bethel D3 MIAC — 9 2 1 3 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2020-21 · Bethel
+342.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3965
Defenseman overall
#428
Defenseman born in 2002
#3265
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Cheyenne Harris
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Union (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Turnquist
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Amanda Kimmerle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ RPI (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Megan Hinze
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Briana Jorde
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cheyenne Harris
Union ·
0.324 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Turnquist
Clarkson ·
0.171 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Amanda Kimmerle
RPI ·
0.059 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.