← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jillian Tabaka Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 North St. Paul/Tartan (W) USHS-MN-W 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 North St. Paul/Tartan (W) USHS-MN-W 25 8 10 18 0.720 0.1087 0.1087
2020-21 North St. Paul/Tartan (W) USHS-MN-W 13 8 3 11 0.846 0.1278 0.1278
2021-22 North St. Paul/Tartan (W) USHS-MN-W 26 18 18 36 1.385 0.2091 0.2091
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA 27 6 8 14 0.518
2022-23 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA FR 25 4 6 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2022-23 · Concordia (WI)
+189.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4830
Forward overall
#199
Forward born in 2003
#893
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2024-25
0.548 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2011-12
0.259 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2014-15
0.519 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.