IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zsofia Pazmandi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-16 Country: Hungary
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 OHA Mavericks Tardiff U22 OWHL-U22 51 19 22 41 0.804 0.2810 0.2810 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lindenwood D1 WCHA-W — 37 16 14 30 0.811
2024-25 Lindenwood D1 WCHA-W — 29 8 6 14 0.483
2023-24 Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 24 15 6 21 0.875
2023-24 Plattsburgh State D3 — — 26 15 6 21 0.808
2023-24 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — — 26 15 6 21 0.808
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2023-24 · Plattsburgh
+263.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2315
Forward overall
#102
Forward born in 2002
#93
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

Amy Petersen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ Penn State (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Paige Voight
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Emily Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Casey Leveillee
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amy Petersen
Penn State ·
0.784 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mariah Gardner
Minnesota ·
0.071 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Paige Voight
Merrimack ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.