← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lula Swanson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Prior Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 20 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Prior Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 6 4 10 0.400 0.0604 0.0604
2020-21 Prior Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 19 11 6 17 0.895 0.1351 0.1351
2021-22 Prior Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 20 10 30 1.200 0.1812 0.1812
2022-23 Prior Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 27 22 12 34 1.259 0.1902 0.1725
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC 4 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC 15 0 1 1 0.067
2023-24 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC 6 1 1 2 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2023-24 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+121.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4359
Forward overall
#173
Forward born in 2005
#750
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2023-24
0.548 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2024-25
0.210 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Benedict · 2018-19
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.