IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Karen Hudson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Washington Pride 19U AAA JWHL-U19 15 9 2 11 0.733 0.2753 0.2753 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 24 1 2 3 0.125
2017-18 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 24 1 2 3 0.125
2016-17 Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 26 2 5 7 0.269
2016-17 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 26 2 5 7 0.269
2015-16 Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 23 4 4 8 0.348
2015-16 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 23 4 4 8 0.348
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2015-16 · Plattsburgh
+47.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2937
Forward overall
#79
in JWHL-U19

D1 Comparables

Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.52 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sydney Brodt
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Danielle Marmer
19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Wente
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Maddie McCollins
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2017-18
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Presleigh Giesbrecht
Post · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Leary
Utica · 2007-08
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.