← New Search ↗ Social Card

Katelyn Brightbill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-11-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Washington Pride 19U AAA JWHL-U19 27 14 11 25 0.926 0.3476 0.3260
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA SR 32 5 19 24 0.750
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D3 JR 32 5 19 24 0.750
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA JR 2 1 2 3 1.500
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D3 SO 2 1 2 3 1.500
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA SO 32 9 18 27 0.844
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D3 FR 32 9 18 27 0.844
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.84
2019-20 · Franklin Pierce
+202.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1963
Forward overall
#101
Forward born in 1999
#48
in JWHL-U19

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.16 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bemidji State ·
0.371 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bemidji State ·
0.114 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota State ·
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.