IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Abby Hustler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-05 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Minnesota Frost · PWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Newbridge Academy U14 JWHL-U19 5 5 2 7 1.400 0.4656 0.5166 — —
2018-19 Mount Academy Saints U19 U19-AAA-W 43 54 39 93 2.163 — — — —
2025-26 Minnesota Frost PWHL 30 4 9 13 0.433 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC-W SR 39 19 20 39 1.000
2023-24 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC-W JR 39 24 31 55 1.410
2022-23 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC-W SO 39 16 20 36 0.923
2021-22 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC-W FR 37 12 16 28 0.757
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.48
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2021-22 · St. Lawrence
+57.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 26 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.78 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jessie Aney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.17 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Katelynn Russ
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.64 PPG
→ Union (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ivy Dynek
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Detert
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jessie Aney
UConn ·
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.