IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Makenna Williment Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-07-27 Country: Canada Height: 5'10" (177 cm)
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Balmoral Hall JWHL-U19 22 4 4 8 0.364 0.1365 0.1400 — —
2024-25 Balmoral Hall U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 30 16 23 39 1.300 0.2978 0.2814 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Syracuse D1 CHA-W FR 37 1 2 3 0.081
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2025-26 · Syracuse
-57.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3344
Forward overall
#118
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Paige Voight
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Casey Leveillee
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alev Baysoy
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.86 PPG
→ Princeton
0.29 No data
NCAAe PPG
Emily Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Addison Andre
Franklin Pierce · 2024-25
0.676 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brynn Puppe
Williams · 2016-17
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mollie Johnson
Neumann · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.