IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Camryn Grimley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-01-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Philadelphia Jr Flyers 16U 16U-AAA-W 66 3 26 29 0.439 0.1970 0.1961 — —
2023-24 Philadelphia Jr Flyers 19U 19U-AAA-W 64 4 18 22 0.344 0.1171 0.1189 — —
2024-25 Philadelphia Jr Flyers 19U JWHL-U19 21 4 12 16 0.762 0.2860 0.2752 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UConn D1 HEA-W FR 37 0 3 3 0.081
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2025-26 · UConn
-59.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#979
Defenseman overall
#160
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Anna Kilponen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Bella Sutton
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.69 PPG
→ Penn State (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Linnea Hedin
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dani Sadek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Kelsey Cline
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.64 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anna Kilponen
North Dakota ·
0.257 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Bella Sutton
Penn State ·
0.324 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Linnea Hedin
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.114 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.