← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Sara Martin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-02 Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
Concordia
Verbal MIAC D3W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.09
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1043
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.19
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2176
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

2%
NCAA D1W
12%
NCAA D3W
85%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 Northwood School NE-Prep-Girls 71 10 19 29 0.408 0.1327 0.1296
2025-26 Northwood School NE-Prep-Girls 69 8 12 20 0.290 0.0942 0.0875
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Sierra Semmel NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG 0.000 Maine
Liz Trautz USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG 0.094 Colgate
Rebecca Lindblad USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.057 UConn
Madison Oelkers USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.61 PPG 0.257 Minnesota State
Erin Meyers USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG 0.897 Saint Anselm

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Reese Swanson 2023-24 · 0.67 PPG 0.267 St. Olaf MIAC
Kailin Kane 2023-24 · 0.28 PPG 0.625 Johnson & Wales NEHC
Michelle Smith 2023-24 · 1.44 PPG 0.130 St. Catherine MIAC
Bella Webb 2022-23 · 0.56 PPG 0.316 Bethel MIAC
Amelia McQuay 2024-25 · 0.43 PPG 0.423 Bethel MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.