Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Crookston High | USHS-MN-W | 18 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 0.778 | 0.1174 | 0.1174 |
| 2021-22 | Crookston High | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 20 | 17 | 37 | 1.423 | 0.2149 | 0.2149 |
| 2022-23 | Crookston High | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 21 | 16 | 37 | 1.480 | 0.2235 | 0.2119 |
| 2023-24 | Crookston High | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 0.667 | 0.1007 | 0.0913 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | St. Olaf | MIAC | SO | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2024-25 | St. Olaf | MIAC | FR | 15 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.267 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Kimmerle | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG | 0.059 | RPI |
| Megan Hinze | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG | 0.182 | Minnesota State |
| Emma Turbyville | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG | 0.040 | St. Cloud State |
| Andrea Olson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.58 PPG | 0.056 | Merrimack |
| Arianna Kosakowski | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG | 0.000 | Union |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erika McDonald | 2016-17 · 0.54 PPG | — | Adrian | NCHA |
| Mckenzie Perry | 2024-25 · 2.30 PPG | 0.100 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Kylie Ligday | 2022-23 · 0.81 PPG | 0.280 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Aubree McDonagh | 2023-24 · 0.59 PPG | 0.360 | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Katherine Pauletti | 2011-12 · 0.80 PPG | 0.280 | Concordia (WI) | NCHA |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.