← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Hailey Benson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
Lebanon Valley
Verbal MAC D3W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.11
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1303
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — MAC
0.28
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.3409
Conf. Strength1.059
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

8%
NCAA D1W
10%
NCAA D3W
82%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 — 19U-AAA-W 40 8 6 14 0.350 0.1437 0.1437
2025-26 Washington Pride 19U AAA JWHL-U19 16 5 0 5 0.312 0.1213 0.1213
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Tianna Gunderson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG 0.069 Minnesota
Renee Saltness USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG 0.029 Quinnipiac
Rebecca Lindblad USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG 0.057 UConn
Suvi Ollikainen SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG 0.151 St. Cloud State
Danielle Marmer NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG 0.000 Quinnipiac

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Jana Lesch 2023-24 · 1.44 PPG 0.222 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Abby Reule 2022-23 · 0.69 PPG 0.450 Concordia MIAC
Sam Mugge 2015-16 · 0.80 PPG — Wisconsin-Superior WIAC
Alyson Vogelsang 2023-24 · 0.81 PPG — St. Catherine MIAC
Brooke Klemz 2023-24 · 1.15 PPG 0.280 Hamline MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.