← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Elizabeth Mehling Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-01-01 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.10
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1079
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.26
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2771
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

8%
NCAA D1W
18%
NCAA D3W
75%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 NAHA Red 16U 16U-AAA-W 64 5 7 12 0.188 0.0596 0.0596
2024-25 NAHA Red 16U 16U-AAA-W 51 7 12 19 0.372 0.1185 0.1185
2025-26 — 19U-AAA-W 57 5 9 14 0.246 0.1008 0.1008
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Briana Jorde USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG 0.077 Bemidji State
Cheyenne Harris USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG 0.324 Union
Taylor Turnquist USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG 0.171 Clarkson
Amanda Kimmerle USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG 0.059 RPI
Megan Hinze USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG 0.182 Minnesota State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Tallulah Bryant 2022-23 · 1.00 PPG 0.273 Lake Forest NCHA
Allie LeClaire 2023-24 · 0.79 PPG 0.333 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Macy Peterson 2022-23 · 0.93 PPG 0.296 Hamline MIAC
Anna Rausch 2024-25 · 0.86 PPG 0.312 St. Norbert NCHA
Kate Elbrecht 2025-26 · 0.66 PPG — RPI ECAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.