← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lizzie Aveson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-18 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Worcester Blades · CWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 New Hampton NE-Prep-Girls 31 13 10 23 0.740 0.4592 0.4592
2012-13 New Hampton NE-Prep-Girls 30 0 1 1 0.030 0.0186 0.0186
2017-18 Worcester Blades CWHL 26 0 1 1 0.038
2019-20 Worcester Blades CWHL 7 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Worcester Blades CWHL 7 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Worcester Blades CWHL 7 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Worcester Blades CWHL 7 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Worcester Blades CWHL 7 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Worcester Blades CWHL 7 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 3 0 2 2 0.667
2013-14 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 3 0 2 2 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2013-14 · Plattsburgh
+299.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5755
Forward overall
#150
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.05 PPG
→ Cornell (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.01 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Harvard (1.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.01 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Mary's · 2023-24
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2024-25
0.038 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.