IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Theresa Knutson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-01 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Metropolitan Riveters · PHF

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — USHS-W 21 24 10 34 1.619 0.4713 0.4960 — —
2011-12 — USHS-W 55 79 48 127 2.309 0.6722 0.6785 — —
2012-13 — USHS-W 50 89 18 107 2.140 0.6230 0.6028 — —
2013-14 Onalaska High USHS-W 22 69 18 87 3.954 1.1512 1.0560 — —
2020-21 Metropolitan Riveters PHF 3 1 0 1 0.333 — — — —
2021-22 Metropolitan Riveters PHF 19 6 6 12 0.632 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 UConn D1 HEA-W SR 39 13 5 18 0.462
2016-17 UConn D1 HEA-W JR 23 10 9 19 0.826
2015-16 UConn D1 HEA-W SO 37 19 9 28 0.757
2014-15 UConn D1 HEA-W FR 36 9 5 14 0.389
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.87
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2014-15 · UConn
-55.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#104
Forward overall
#9
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Caitrin Lonergan
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.44 PPG
→ Boston College (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
1.12 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Shayna Tomlinson
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Rensselaer (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.96 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brooke Avery
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.92 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Victoria Samuelsson
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.82 PPG
→ Penn State (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
1.16 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Caitrin Lonergan
Boston College ·
0.892 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shayna Tomlinson
Rensselaer ·
0.531 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brooke Avery
New Hampshire ·
0.062 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.