IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carly Moran Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Winona High USHS-W 16 13 3 16 1.000 0.3007 0.3007 — —
2011-12 Winona High USHS-W 22 32 13 45 2.046 0.6151 0.6151 — —
2012-13 Winona High USHS-W 24 57 17 74 3.083 0.9271 0.9271 — —
2013-14 Winona High USHS-W 23 44 18 62 2.696 0.8106 0.8106 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC SR 28 25 21 46 1.643
2016-17 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC JR 29 22 29 51 1.759
2015-16 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC SO 29 20 13 33 1.138
2014-15 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC FR 31 15 19 34 1.097
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.85
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.10
2014-15 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+28.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#158
Forward overall
#27
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Lauren Abbenante
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Aly Tremblay
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG
→ RPI (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.78 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Phoebe Staenz
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Yale (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.86 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bridget Carey
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Brown (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.86 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.54 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lauren Abbenante
Holy Cross ·
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aly Tremblay
RPI ·
0.030 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Phoebe Staenz
Yale ·
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.